Organization
The Praxis Project Inc
See who has funded you, who else those funders support, and which potential new funders your network brings into view.
1
Your funders
99 funders have made program grants to you since 2016. The 5 shown below are the most recent; each row shows how many years they funded you and the total amount recorded. Of these, 36 are locally focused, 60 have national reach, and 3 are no longer active.
- Robert Wood Johnson Foundationone-time$5,010,462
- Pritzker Family Foundation4 years$2,612,450
- The Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund2 years$1,118,079
- The Schmidt Family Foundation5 years$845,000
- Ford Foundation4 years$633,625
Showing 5 of 99. See all 126 funders
27 others are DAFs (donor-advised funds), matching-gift programs or similar pass-throughs — intermediaries carrying someone else's choice, so no step below uses them.
2
Your funding peers
Funding peers are organizations that share one or more of your funders. Start with organizations in a related field that share at least three of them. Explore all 22,144 funding connections →
24 Public Health Program (Includes General Health and Wellness Promotion Services) funding peers share at least three of your funders.
- Black Women for WellnessCA12 shared funders
- Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program ManagementCA11 shared funders
- Health Resources in Action IncMA9 shared funders
- Public Health Foundation IncCA8 shared funders
- California Black Womens Health ProjectCA7 shared funders
- American Public Health Association IncDC5 shared funders
- California Latinas for Reproductive JusticeCA5 shared funders
- Public Health Institute of Metropolitan ChicagoIL5 shared funders
See all 24 Public Health Program (Includes General Health and Wellness Promotion Services) peers →
3
Potential new funders
Potential new funders have not funded you since 2016, but they fund organizations in your funding network. They are ranked by the strength of their connections through your funders and funding peers.
In historical data, funders connected this way later funded an organization like yours about twenty times as often as a random eligible funder, and still only about one in fifty times. This is a historical pattern, not a prediction.
Showing the first 3 strongly connected funders.